1. Final Announcement: We're Saying Goodbye to AstronomyConnect. Read Our Closing Notice.
Dismiss Notice
New Cookie Policy
On May 24, 2018, we published revised versions of our Terms and Rules and Cookie Policy. Your use of AstronomyConnect.com’s services is subject to these revised terms.

M13 Reprocessed - 03/06/2022

Discussion in 'Astrophotography and Imaging' started by Ed D, Mar 6, 2022.

M13 Reprocessed - 03/06/2022

Started by Ed D on Mar 6, 2022 at 3:04 PM

11 Replies 1262 Views 2 Likes

Reply to Thread Post New Thread
  1. Ed D

    Ed D Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2017
    Posts:
    855
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Location:
    Sunny South Florida
    Around 5 years ago I imaged M13, the Hercules Cluster, when I had just started getting into imaging. My ASI290MC was then new, and I used it in the AT72ED that I no longer own, and CG-4 with motor drive. I didn't know as much back then as I know now. I processed the few light frames I took in RegiStax 6.

    Today I took that image and 'tweaked' it using GIMP. This is what I came up with:

    M13 Hercules Cluster 2017 07-14 redone 2022 03-06.jpg
    Hercules Cluster Redo 03/06/2022

    This is the image I came up with in 2017:

    M13 Hercules Cluster 2017 07-14.jpg
    Hercules Cluster as Imaged in 2017

    Same Image, but reprocessed knowing what I now know. I have refined my skills in the past five years, not to mention that programs (apps?) have come a long way, too. My next victim I plan on imaging is the Little Beehive in Canis Major. Stay tuned.

    Ed D
     
    PXR-5 and Orion25 like this.
  2. Ed D

    Ed D Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2017
    Posts:
    855
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Location:
    Sunny South Florida
    Here are a few more of my early images that I reprocessed last night:

    Omega Centauri 2018 02-16 reprocessed 2022 03-06.jpg
    Omega Centauri - reprocessed 03/06/2022

    Double Cluster in Perseus 2018 12-29 reprocessed 2022 03-06 sized.jpg
    Double cluster in Perseus - Reprocessed 03/06/2022


    M57 Ring Nebula 2017 07-25 reprocessed 2022 03-06.jpg
    Ring Nebula - Reprocessed 03/06/2022

    The clusters now appear fuller with more background stars, as well as a contrast improvement making the subject better defined and stand out better. The Ring Nebula colors are brighter and stand out much better, and a background that was kind of greenish is now black.

    Ed D
     
    Last edited: Mar 7, 2022
    PXR-5 and Mak the Night like this.
  3. Orion25

    Orion25 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 23, 2016
    Posts:
    1,895
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Georgia
    I can see the progression in your images of M13. All nice shots. I want to get some shots this summer. Love the colors in the Ring!
     
    Ed D likes this.
  4. Ed D

    Ed D Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2017
    Posts:
    855
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Location:
    Sunny South Florida
    Thank you, Reggie. My imaging and processing skills have improved over the years, as have the programs that I use. I still use some programs that are well on in years, but they serve specific purposes.

    At this moment I'm photographing the Rosette Nebula using my new ZWO Duo-Band filter in the imaging train. I'm finishing up dinner and on-line while the camera tracks and clicks away. If I get good data, and I say 'if' because I haven't used the new filter yet, I will be posting what I hope will be a nice image.

    Ed D
     
    Orion25 likes this.
  5. Orion25

    Orion25 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 23, 2016
    Posts:
    1,895
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Georgia
    Looking forward to it, Ed :)
     
    Ed D likes this.
  6. Mak the Night

    Mak the Night Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2016
    Posts:
    4,926
    Trophy Points:
    113
    M57 is very nice Ed. I discovered late last year that I can use a broadband OIII on it at a 1.5mm exit pupil with my 72mm ED doublet. It makes it a bit green though lol.
     
    Ed D likes this.
  7. Ed D

    Ed D Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2017
    Posts:
    855
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Location:
    Sunny South Florida
    Years ago, when my area was a Red Zone, I remember observing M57 through the 6" f/8 Dob I had, as well as with the AT72ED. What a sight that was. I also remember using my O-III filter, which I still have, on nebulae, such as Orion and Lagoon.

    Unfortunately, I rarely do visual any more. Not because I lost interest, but because I can't see anything in the night sky any more. Last night I set up my 'Little Friend', the AT60ED, on my Alt-Az mount to do some observing. What a sad joke that was. It wasn't even 10 minutes and I brought the equipment back in the house. Can't wait for the bright planets to reappear in the night sky.

    Ed
     
  8. Mak the Night

    Mak the Night Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2016
    Posts:
    4,926
    Trophy Points:
    113
    How about something like a fast 4" achromat like the ST102? It's not ridiculously expensive and quite portable.

    st102stock.jpg

    It might help with the LP for some rich field and/or deep sky.

    moon.jpg

    Mine ended up with a MoonLite! One year it got out more than the 72ED.
     
    Ed D likes this.
  9. Ed D

    Ed D Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2017
    Posts:
    855
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Location:
    Sunny South Florida
    I used to have an AT72ED that I purchased years ago when they first came out. I used the daylights out of that scope, both visually and imaging, and it went with me to Everglades National Park many times. If there was one piece of astro gear I regretted selling it was that scope.

    I kept three scopes: a Tele Vue TV-85 used for visual and imaging, an iOptron 150mm Mak that I love for planetary and lunar imaging, and a 10" SkyWatcher Dob that I have used for observing and planetary imaging. The TV-85 gets used the most, by far, because it has good aperture, but not so much that the bright sky washes out the image.

    I bought the little 60mm because I wanted something for imaging with a shorter focal length than the TV-85, but longer than the camera lenses I have. I'm very happy with it. I had to try it visually, but it just doesn't have enough ooomph for the backyard.

    Ed
     
  10. Mak the Night

    Mak the Night Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2016
    Posts:
    4,926
    Trophy Points:
    113
    72.jpg

    My SW 72ED DS Pro gets out the most as it's the easiest and most balanced on the AZ5 alt-az. I'm not sure about the flint element, probably some FPL- 51 equivalent although the crown is Schott.

    72b.jpg

    As I live on the Worcs/Staffs border in the greenbelt, LP isn't such an issue for me. I have bigger refractors but portability appeals to me as I'm physically disabled.
     
    Ed D likes this.
  11. Ed D

    Ed D Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2017
    Posts:
    855
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Location:
    Sunny South Florida
    I understand the appeal of smaller equipment and portability. I had a disagreement with a pit bull 2 1/2 years ago that left me with injuries I have since learned how to deal with.

    Ed
     
  12. Mak the Night

    Mak the Night Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2016
    Posts:
    4,926
    Trophy Points:
    113
    And there is the benefit of being able to take advantage of breaks in the weather with a smaller scope. Although smaller catadioptrics can take time to reach thermal equilibrium.

    102.jpg

    My 102mm SkyMax is a very portable lunar/planetary scope but can take up to 40 minutes to cool down.
     
    Ed D likes this.

Share This Page