1. Final Announcement: We're Saying Goodbye to AstronomyConnect. Read Our Closing Notice.
Dismiss Notice
New Cookie Policy
On May 24, 2018, we published revised versions of our Terms and Rules and Cookie Policy. Your use of AstronomyConnect.com’s services is subject to these revised terms.

more junk in space!

Discussion in 'General Astronomy Chat' started by kevan hubbard, Jan 26, 2018.

more junk in space!

Started by kevan hubbard on Jan 26, 2018 at 6:12 AM

25 Replies 3028 Views 0 Likes

Reply to Thread Post New Thread
  1. kevan hubbard

    kevan hubbard Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 15, 2016
    Posts:
    609
    Trophy Points:
    43
    I was disheartened to read today of more gimmicky light polluting junk being launched into space this time by New Zealand. If we recall a Moscow university launched a crowd funded satellite last year which was expected to be the brightest object in the sky after the sun and moon but thankfully it failed to inflate. The Russians claimed it was to test breaking,as in slowing down not breaking up!,in space but it really seemed to be a vanity project ,a vanity project of -9 magnitude had it worked!the New Zealand one doesn't even have a flimsy scientific excuse it's a work of art to show the fragility of the earth but clearly not that of the night sky!although I am impressed that the new Zealanders did manage to construct a rocket using 3d printers and get it up into space ,well low orbit.the satellite is likened to a disco ball and we can only hope it to breaks up or doesn't deploy correctly.
     
  2. Mak the Night

    Mak the Night Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2016
    Posts:
    4,926
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Don't tell ESA about 3D printing they'll be xeroxing Ariane Fives!

    5.jpeg
     
  3. Dave In Vermont

    Dave In Vermont Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2016
    Posts:
    3,356
    Trophy Points:
    113
  4. kevan hubbard

    kevan hubbard Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 15, 2016
    Posts:
    609
    Trophy Points:
    43
    We can hope it doesn't deploy like the Russian one?I'm a bit sceptical as to if you can 3d print a whole rocket due to all the high stress/pressure parts.bit like the media claims about 3d guns,you could 3d print a gun but it'd blow up upon firing it!
     
  5. Dave In Vermont

    Dave In Vermont Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2016
    Posts:
    3,356
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Perhaps we can send the 3D gun up to the polydecahedron-thing and shoot it down? :p

    Sorry - couldn't resist! :D
     
  6. kevan hubbard

    kevan hubbard Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 15, 2016
    Posts:
    609
    Trophy Points:
    43
    Or 3d print a surface to missile missile and get it on the way up?3d printing is all well and good but 3d printing the components that take the stress?in rockets stuff like the combustion chamber, not possible. In guns breeches, barrels,firing pins,etc..a 3d rocket man still needs a host of original parts.plus 3d printing fuel!
     
    Dave In Vermont likes this.
  7. Mak the Night

    Mak the Night Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2016
    Posts:
    4,926
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Why not just print the entire rocket and post it into space? No, come to think of it, the Royal Mail would still lose it.
     
  8. Dave In Vermont

    Dave In Vermont Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2016
    Posts:
    3,356
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Pity one can't 3D-print a few kilo's of Pu239...

    I know where to send it to.
     
  9. Nebula

    Nebula Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2016
    Posts:
    1,823
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ouff some people go to jail for saying less then that in the US nowadays.
     
  10. Dave In Vermont

    Dave In Vermont Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2016
    Posts:
    3,356
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I'd be worried - if you could 3D-Print Plutonium! :p :cool:
     
  11. Dave In Vermont

    Dave In Vermont Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2016
    Posts:
    3,356
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Hiya Again -

    I was just thumbing/clicking my way through some articles from Scientific American (I'd have thought a name like "Scientific American" would get one brought up on charges of 'High-Treason' these days), and I ran into another article on this flying Loss of Nightvison. And the opinion of the author. He touches on some things many of us haven't yet considered. So...

    I thought I might share it with any & all interested folk. And here you go - open to read, or download the Pdf. for later:

    Twinkle, Twinkle, Satellite Vermin.pdf

    Taking a 'Straw Poll' on the general public opinion on this thing - including non-astronomy sites of the news-media - most people are against this thing. The feeling is this will act as paving the way to seeing the road paved to flying "DRINK COCA~COLA!" signs and the "GOLDEN ARCHES" glowing across our skies.

    At least that's the 'good-news' of this 'Hunk-O'-Space-Junk.'

    evaD
     

    Attached Files:

  12. Mak the Night

    Mak the Night Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2016
    Posts:
    4,926
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Eventually they're going to have to cut down on space junk anyway. Otherwise serious space platforms like the ISS will be in even more danger of collisions.

     
    Dave In Vermont likes this.
  13. Mak the Night

    Mak the Night Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2016
    Posts:
    4,926
    Trophy Points:
    113
     
  14. Dave In Vermont

    Dave In Vermont Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2016
    Posts:
    3,356
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Speaking of 'space-junk,' look at what I just saw in an article on Russian Cosmonauts taking the longest space-history in order to install~repair some equipment on the ISS(Zarya):

    Electronics-Box Thrown by Russian Cosmonaut off the ISS.gif

    During the work, one of the Cosmonauts purposely tossed away what was described as being an 'old electronics' box.' "So what?" Here's what:

    The ISS is traveling at roughly 22,000 miles-per-hour, which is quite literally 'faster than a speeding bullet." So taking the formula of MASS/VELOCITY, this piece of junk would go right through a spacecraft or other satellites. And it will take a rather large computer to track it's telemetry and location so we can program everything up there to avoid a potentially catastrophic collision.

    I should hope that these astro-cosmonauts' would be better trained.

    R & D
     
  15. Nebula

    Nebula Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2016
    Posts:
    1,823
    Trophy Points:
    113
    They don't have much discipline trowing stuff like that into space.. If they are 100% sure they will burn in the atmosphere that's another story...
     
  16. Mak the Night

    Mak the Night Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2016
    Posts:
    4,926
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Well, all the empty borscht tins they've been throwing out of Russian spacecraft for decades all burnt up on re-entry.
     
  17. Nebula

    Nebula Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2016
    Posts:
    1,823
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Lol let's trow all the trashes in the atmosphere while we are there.
     
  18. PXR-5

    PXR-5 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2016
    Posts:
    83
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Location:
    NC, USA
    I wonder if the Tesla has it turn signal on when orbiting :)
     
  19. Nebula

    Nebula Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2016
    Posts:
    1,823
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Hello PXR-5 welcome to Astronomy Connect!
     
    PXR-5 likes this.
  20. Dave In Vermont

    Dave In Vermont Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2016
    Posts:
    3,356
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Indeed! Welcome aboard! And a sense of humor and absurdity is always a plus!!! +++

    Don't be a stranger -

    Dave

    p.s. - Great avatar!
     
    Nebula and PXR-5 like this.

Share This Page