1. Final Announcement: We're Saying Goodbye to AstronomyConnect. Read Our Closing Notice.
Dismiss Notice
New Cookie Policy
On May 24, 2018, we published revised versions of our Terms and Rules and Cookie Policy. Your use of AstronomyConnect.com’s services is subject to these revised terms.

Sunspots 2713 and 2715 - 23 June 2018

Discussion in 'Astrophotography and Imaging' started by Ed D, Jun 23, 2018.

Sunspots 2713 and 2715 - 23 June 2018

Started by Ed D on Jun 23, 2018 at 1:54 PM

3 Replies 935 Views 4 Likes

Reply to Thread Post New Thread
  1. Ed D

    Ed D Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2017
    Posts:
    855
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Location:
    Sunny South Florida
    I'm sure you have heard the saying: "When life gives you lemons, make lemonade."

    No, I didn't set out to make lemonade, so to speak. It started a few days ago when I was trying to image Venus in the evening, and up at 3:30am hoping to image Mars. Venus was a wash that evening, but I had three very good captures of Mars in the morning that would have turned out some nice images, one in IR. I don't know what happened, but when I was transferring from one computer to another, POOF!, my work disappeared. Don't ask, I don't have a clue.

    Last night I finally gave up on the planets due to consistent bad weather and I put the 6" Mak away. This morning I noticed a bright light outside. Wow, sunshine! So, as I sat sipping my morning Joe I pulled up the SPACEWEATHER website. Lo and behold, not one, but two sunspots. Haven't seen those in a long time, either. I set up my AT72ED with solar filter and the rest of the equipment. Man, the sunlight was bright. I had to put my laptop in a box to shield it from the sunlight so I could have hopes of seeing an image on the screen, in the shade.

    I did captures at f/6, f/12 and f/18 of 2,500 frames each. The one at f/18 didn't turn out well at all. But, surprise of surprises, the one at f/12 captured 2713 at the edge of the sun very nicely. I was actually after 2715, the one centered on the sun, but it didn't turn out all that hot (pun intended). Anyway, with some processing I turned out two pretty nice solar images, which were not at all planned.

    Enjoy the images,
    Ed D

    Sunspots 2713 and 2715.jpg
    Sunspots 2715, left of middle, and 2713, left edge.

    Sunspot 2713.jpg
    Sunspot 2713
     
    Last edited: Jun 23, 2018
  2. Dave In Vermont

    Dave In Vermont Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2016
    Posts:
    3,356
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Nice images! You're right - haven't seen a Sunspot in years it seems.

    I especially like the shot of 2713 coming up the limb. I've seen some bizarre things happen as the Sun comes out of it's minimum - like vanishing images & tripods collapsing without provocation.
     
    Last edited: Jun 23, 2018
  3. Orion25

    Orion25 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 23, 2016
    Posts:
    1,895
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Georgia
    Nice sunspots, Ed. Sorry about your planetary data, but I'm glad you didn't let it stop you from turning your eyes to Sol!
     
  4. Ed D

    Ed D Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2017
    Posts:
    855
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Location:
    Sunny South Florida
    @Dave: Thanks. Yeah, the sun can cause weird things to happen. Remember when Toyota cars were suddenly running WOT and couldn't be controlled? I remember reading a short article that said a small group of scientists theorized that solar activity was causing this. Funny, the sun went dormant and the cars stopped behaving erratically.

    @ Reggie: Thanks. I'm still hoping to image Mars during the dust storm, which I believe may be dying out. I also want to image Venus. Last night was clear and I did set up the 6" Mak. The videos were bad enough to give anyone nightmares. Venus looked like a blob of jelly shimmering violently. I'm going to try in a while to see if I get anything, but I doubt it.

    I did find out that aperture does help when imaging in IR. When using the TV-85 my frame rate was in seconds with the 850nm filter. With the 6" Mak it was milliseconds.

    Ed D
     

Share This Page